From the modelling of
secondary arm space and composition difference in dendrite of TiAl the arm
space is found nm scale. Through the change the composition and its difference
& arm space length is observed little too. The composition arrangement is
0.4~0.53 meanwhile the arm space length is 20?m~40?m. Then the scope of
observation has been 0~0.1 and 0~1 composition difference. Detail content
including the equation is discussed as below (Figure 1).
From Figure 1(a~d) it is seen that the secondary
arm space difference is from 0 to 2.7nm and 27nm that explains the change of
arm space is little. It will increase when the composition difference changes
from 0 to 0.1.

(a) Com=0.45~0.51

(a) Com=0.4~0.53

(a) L;
?Com=0~0.1

(a) L;
?Com=0~1
Figure 1:
The graph of secondary arm space difference and composition difference.
In Figure 1 (a) the
difference of arm space between composition difference with 0.45 and 0.51 is
little meanwhile in Figure 1(c) it is big to two times with 2.7nm and 1.5nm
respectively between secondary arm space with 20?m and 40?m. The composition is
0.52 in Figure 1 (c). In Figure 1(d) in the arrangement of ?Com with 0~1 the
proportional graph is gained with the same slope with Figure1 (c). The more arm
space is the smaller the arm space difference will be. So the benefit is the
bigger arm space who can bring littler arm space difference. As we know that
the high cooling speed is low space difference under a certain property like
mechanical tensile property and creep etc.
Since it has
T=KL --- (1)
And T=a*Com+b --- (2)
So it has
K= (a*Com+b)/L --- (3)
Let Com=0.44 and L=20?m,
it has
K=36460 --- (4)
Since too it has
?T=-1000?Com ---?5?
And ?T=36460*?L --- (6)
It becomes
?L=0.027*?Com ---?7?
Here T is temperature K;
K is the constant; L is secondary arm space difference ?m; a and b is constant
too; Com is composition; ?T and ?L is the difference of temperature and
secondary arm space respectively K & ?m. ?Com is the difference of
composition Al.
When the
arm space is constant 20?m and 40?m the space difference has little value. In
special the composition difference becomes little with this deduced constant K.
Maybe its value has problem that needs us to further more research but the
defining has been not wrong. Therefore the result exhibits the small secondary
arm space difference one in solidification in TiAl alloys. That means that the
change has been not too much so the uniformity has been maintained in the
dendritic growth course in the solidification of TiAl which is main and destination
and achievement in this paper. The dentritic secondary arm space difference has
not been happened in this study. It means that the nm scale will be found to
change, so the cooling rate is uniformed which is the main cause. If there is
wave in cooling rate the arm space will change too. It has problem to control
the cooling rate and dentritic growth. If the changed cooling rate will be a
method to gain changed dentrite we want to. Besides the composition and
secondary arm space will affect another effectiveness.