The
relationship between composition and temperature (Figure 1)
Figure 1 shows that the two lines with liquid
and solid phase meet in one point. The cooling rate ?T is known.

Figure 1: The relations of
dentrite and equilibrium state.

Figure 2: The relationship
between temperature ad compositions in dentrite.
It shows two phases
decrease below the liquids phase line. It shows these two line relations in
constitutional super cool. We choose the certain value to proceed experiment.
Here C is the Al composition, Cl and Cs is the liquid and
solid composition of Al.
Let T=aC+b (1)
We have
Tl=aCl+b (2)
Ts=aCs+b (3)
According to Ti-Al
state equilibrium state we have supposed
Cl=0.44, Tl=1833K
and
Cs= 0.46, Ts=1813K
Substitute above
constant to (2) and (3), so
a=-1000, b=2273. The
formula (1) is
T=-1000C+2273 (4)
This is the equation to
calculate temperature in terms of composition (Figure 2).
From Figure 2 we know
the distribution of temperature and composition in directional solidification.
When composition difference increases temperature decreased somewhat in term of
content in dentrite. When composition difference is from 0 to 1 the temperature
changes from 230K to 1300K respectively. It means Y changes from pure X to pure
Y ie. 0 to 100%Y the temperature will change from maximum to minimum at Al
composition in materials like TiAl.
Calculation
of cooling rate (Figure 3)
As Figure 3 when
composition deference increases cooling rates rate increases properly at 20mm
solidified length with the drawing speed from 1060mm/hr, 1560mm/hr and
2060mm/hr. Drawing speed increases so that cooling rate increases a certain.
The period one of cooling rate is from 0.5K/s to 22 K/s in speed of 1560mm/hr.
The gap is bigger between 1560mm/h with drawing speed v than that of 1060mm/h.
For engineering use the speed is better when the speed is higher like 2060mm/h.
When the cooling rate attains from 0.5K/s to 29K/s with the composition
difference increasing with maximum value in speed of high value. When cooling
rate is 2060mm/hr the biggest one in these three conditions will happen with
29K/s. This is the result of concentration of liquid and solid in terms of
composition.
DT=T1-T2=-1000(C1-C2)
=-150K (5)
t=L/v=20*3600/360=200s
So C= (T1-T2)/t (6)
Here C and DT is
cooling rate and temperature difference respectively (Figure 4).
From Figure 4 DG
decreases with temperature increasing. It decreases with entropy DS increasing
from 1, 2 to 2J/mol/K. It’s decreasing means cooling rate increases along the
dendrite. When speed increases it decreases like 1560mm/h. This is the result
of concentration of liquid and solid in terms of composition. When DS is 1.2J/
(mol•K) the DG changes from 2200J to 1000J with the temperature increases from
850K to 1900K respectively. When DS is 2J/ (mol•K) the DG changes from1500J to
-500J with the temperature increases same. It means that in TiAl when DS
becomes big the DG will decrease. G is Gibbs free energy and DH is enthalpy
[3]. It is supposed that enthalpy is constant in this study.
DG=DH-TDS (7)
In Ti-Al DH and DS are
to be DH=3.3KJ/mol?DS=1.2 J/mol/K at 1492? [4] (Figure 5).

(a) 1060mm/hr.

(b) 1560mm/hr.

(c) 2060mm/hr.
Figure 3:
The relation between cooling rate and ? composition under different speed in
directional solidification.

(a) DS=1.2J/(mol•K).

(b) DS=2J/(mol•K).
Figure 4:
The relations between DG and temperature in solidified state.

Figure 5:
Trend Fmol and CAl with Al content in ? TiAl?? and ? is formed and L
is remained [5].
The concentration of Al under the reaction will be
known in Figure 5. The interface stability is highly expected because of the
constitutional supercoiling. Well-developed dendrites are found at relatively
high solidification rate with 25~100?m/s. As for 44Al at% it uses ?????+? to
measure Al concentration while for above 46Al at% it uses ???. From the line it
will be increased from 44 to56 Al at% for ? phase. From diagram the
concentration of Al is measured to be 1.6at% in 46Al at%. The calculation value
is thought to be phase forming element due to the minus. That has been the low
concentration with and solid solution in TiAl. Maybe good result will be
obtained use the inferior solution model. They agreed with each other well [4].
So they are approximate value calculated with the method.