Sample
collection and materials
Oyster shells were
obtained from Borokiri in Port-Harcourt (River state) from the river side. The
cotton seed oil was purchased in Gausau, Zamfara state, Nigeria. All reagents
used were of the analytical grade.
Methods
Preparation of oyster shell: The shells were properly washed with hot
water to remove the flesh reminants and surface dirts and then air dried for
five days. The shells were crushed and ground to powder form using a roller
mill machine. The powdered sample was sieved into different particle sizes
using sieve of (300, 250, 200, 150, 100 µm).The particle size of 100 µm was
stored and used for the study and labeled as raw oyster shell powder (OSP).
Demineralization of oyster shell powder: The sample (250 g) was weighed and then
transferred into a 1000 mL beaker. 1M HCl (300 mL) solution was added and
stirred thoroughly. The mixture was then heated in a water-bath at 100
for 60 min.
The resulting hot mixture was filtered and washed with distilled water until a
neutral pH was attained.
Deprotenization of oyster shell powder: The
dried demineralized sample (200 g) was weighed into a beaker and 400 mL of
1 M NaOH (solid/liquid ratio 1:2 w/v) was added. The mixture was heated using a
thermostatically controlled hot plate with stirrer at 80
for 1 hr. The
resultant mixture was filtered, washed with distilled water until a neutral pH
was attained. Ethanol (100 mL) was added to the resulting solid sample and
allowed to stand for 24 hr to remove colour pigments. The resulting chitin was
filtered and dried in an oven at 80
for 1 hr.
Deacetylation of oyster shell powder: The resulting chitin from the
deproteinization stage was deacetylized by adding 60 % NaOH solution to the
sample and stirred thoroughly. The mixture was washed until a neutral pH was
attained and dried at 100
for 45 min.
The drying was continued at 150
for another
20 min till the residue was properly dried. The resulting powder which was the
chitosan was labeled as COSP (chitosan oyster shell powder).
Characterization
OSP and COSP
The OSP and COSP were characterized using XRF, FT-IR
and SEM. X-Ray diffraction (XRD), the x ray diffraction method was used to
determine the mineral compositions of the sample. X Ray Fluorescence was used
to determine the chemical compositions of COSP while Fourier Transform Infrared
spectrometry (FT-IR) was used to investigate the presence of functional groups
in the sample and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the
surface morphology of the sample.
Bleaching
Process
Degumming: This is the preliminary stage during bleaching of
oils and the main objective of degumming is to remove the unwanted gums which
can interfere with the stability of the oil in a larger scale production.
Degumming was carried out by adding food grade acid, 0.1 % phosphoric acid (85
%) to the hot oil (30 g) in a beaker heated at 60 oC and stirred
thoroughly.
Bleaching of Cotton Seed Oil (CSO): The bleaching of cottonseed oil was
carried out in a batch method. The degummed (CSO) (30) was weighed into a
beaker and COSP (1 g) was added, heated at 80
for 30 min.
The mixture was filtered with a whatman No 1 filter paper as quickly as
possible to prevent undesirable oxidation. This same procedure was carried out
using 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 g and same was repeated for OSP.
Analysis of bleaching performance: The absorbance of cottonseed oil using
both the COSP and OSP was carried out using the UV-visible Spectrophotometer
model 752. The bleaching efficiency of adsorbent was evaluated by monitoring
the absorbance at 420 nm and expressed in terms of absorbance of light passing
through the medium (CSO bleached with COSP and OSP). The percentage colour
reductions of the bleached oil was calculated using equation 1
Bleaching
Efficiency
---------- (1)
Where, A0 =
Absorbance of unbleached cottonseed oil (initial absorbance)
At =
Absorbance of bleached cotton seed oil at time t
Data
analysis
Adsorption isotherm studies: The adsorption isotherm is
important from both a theoretical and a practical point of view because the
application of adsorption isotherm provide information describing the
interaction between the adsorbate and the adsorbent of any system [22]. There
are several equations for analyzing experimental adsorption equation data. In
the present study, Langmuir, Freundlich, tempkin and D-R isotherms were used to
test the adsorption of colour pigments and other impurities from CSO onto COSP
and OSP.
Langmuir isotherms:
The Langmuir isotherm has been employed to explain the
adsorption of oil pigment and other minor oil solutes during oil processing
though, developed by Langmuir in 1916 to describe gas adsorption. The model
assumes that the adsorbate is bound to a fixed number of energetically equal,
specific sites, each adsorbing one molecule with no interaction occurring
between molecules on adjacent sites. The Langmuir isotherm has been applied to
pigment adsorption from vegetable oil in the form of equation 2

Where x = amount of solute adsorbed,
is the amount of unadsorbed solute (the
equilibrium concentration of adsorbate in solution mg/ L), m is the amount in
grams of adsorbent used,( x/m)is the adsorption capacity at the equilibrium
solute concentration) ‘
’ maximum
adsorption capacity (mg/g), and
is a constant of the intensity of the
adsorption.
Freundlich
isotherms: Freundlich in 1926 developed an empirical equation
that correlates the capacity of the adsorbent with the residual solute
concentration using equation 3 [23].

Where x =
amount of solute adsorbed (mg), m = amount of adsorbent (g), c = amount of
residual solute (concentration) (mg/L) at equilibrium. The Freundlich model is
used to estimate the adsorption affinity of the sorbents towards the adsorbate [24].
K is a constant indicating adsorption capacity, and n is a constant of the
energy of adsorption. Empirical data are evaluated for Freundlich behaviour by
using the equation in its logarithmic form, as equation of a straight line [25].

Temkin isotherm model: Tempkin isotherm is the early model describing
the adsorption of hydrogen onto platinum electrodes within the acidic solutions
[26]. The isotherm contains a factor that explicitly taking into consideration
the amount of adsorbent-adsorbate interactions. By ignoring the extremely low
and large value of concentrations, the model assumes that heat of adsorption
(function of temperature) of all molecules in the layer would decrease linearly
rather than logarithmic with coverage which is attributed to
adsorbate-adsorbate repulsions. It also assumes that adsorption is due to
uniform distribution of binding energy contrary to Freundlich model. The amount
of adsorbate is given as follows:


qe (mg/g )
and Ce(mg/g) are the amount of adsorbed pigments per unit weight of
adsorbent and unadsorbed pigment at equilibrium respectively. A and B are the
Temkin constants. The Temkin isotherm parameters were obtained by plotting qe
against lnCe. It would be worth noting that the constant B is related to heat
of adsorption.
Dubinin- Radushkevich isotherm model: Dubinin – Radushkevich isotherm is
generally applied to express the adsorption mechanism with a Gaussian energy
distribution onto a heterogeneous surface [27,28]. The model has often
successfully fitted high solute activities and the intermediate range of
concentrations data well.

qe = amount
of adsorbate in the adsorbent at equilibrium(mg/g); qs = theoretical
isotherm saturation capacity(mg/g); Kad = Dubinin-Radushkevich
isotherm constant (mol2/kJ2); ? = Dubinin – Radushkevich
isotherm constant. The approach was usually applied to distinguish the physical
and chemical adsorption of metal ions with its mean free energy (E kJ/mol) for
removing a molecule from its location in the sorption space to the infinity
which can be computed by the relationship [29,30].


Where R=8.314 J/molK; T
= absolute temperature; Ce= adsorbate equilibrium concentration
(mg/L). One of the unique features of the Dubinin – Radushkevich ( D-R) isotherm model lies on the fact that
it is temperature – dependent, which when adsorption data at different
temperatures are plotted as a function of logarithm of amount adsorbed lnqe
against ?2 the square of potential energy. All suitable data will
lie on the same curve, named as the characteristic curve [31]. The constant
such as qs and Kad are determined from the appropriate
plot using equation 8. The mean free energy E
(kJ/mol) which is defined as the free energy change when one mole of ion is
transferred to the surface of the solid. Mean free energy was calculated using
the equation 12

The value of E (kJ/mol)
is used to estimate the kind of adsorption. If the value of E (kJ/mol) is in
the range of 8-16 kJ/mol, the adsorption type is explained by ion-exchange, if
E (kJ/mol) is less than 8 (E<8) the adsorption type is due to physisorption
as a result of weak Van der Waal forces of attraction and if E greater than 8
(E>8) the adsorption type is chemical adsorption.