A volume of 20 ?l of
cell suspension and 80 ?l of tryphan blue (1:5 ratio) were pipetted into a
micro centrifuge tube and mixed together. A coverslip was gently pushed over
the chambers of a haemocytometer and 20 ?l of cell suspension was slowly
pipetted against each short side of the coverslip so that the suspension could
spread into each chamber. The haemocytometer was placed onto the stage of an
inverted phase contrast microscope and focused on the central 25 squares of one
chamber. The numbers of cells in these squares were counted. These steps were
repeated for the other chambers. The average number of cells in the center grid
(1 mm2) of each chamber was calculated. This number was multiplied
by 104 to obtain the number of cells per 1ml of suspension. The
total number of cells was calculated by multiplying the number of cells per 1
ml by the total volume of the cell suspension.
Measurement of
cytochrome – c activity in untreated and treated cell lines
Figure 1 shows the
activity of cytochrome-c in (A) the cancer cell lines treated with 800 ?M of
the ?, ? momorcharin for 24 hours and (B) the same cell lines incubated with
media alone but without any ?, ? momorcharin for the same duration of 24 hrs.
The control response of cytochrome-c is also shown in the figure for
comparison. The results show that ?, ? momorcharin can evoke significant (p
< 0.05) increases in cytochrome-c activity in all the cancer cell lines (1321N1,
Gos- 3, U87-MG, Sk Mel, Corl-23, Weri Rb-1 and L6) compared to either untreated
cell lines or control cytochrome-c activity. In L6 skeletal muscle cell line,
cytochrome-c activity increased significantly (p < 0.05) in treated (A)
cells compared to untreated (B) cells but these values were less than the assay
kit control cytochrome-c activity. Figure 1 shows the percentage difference
(treated – untreated cell lines) or increase in cytochrome-c activity in all
six different cancer cell lines (1321N1, Gos-3, U87-MG, Sk Mel, Corl- 23 and
Weri Rb-1) and healthy L6 muscle cell line treated with 800 ?M of ?, ?
momorcharin. The value for each untreated cell line was taken as 100 % and the
value for the respected treated cell line was expressed as a percentage of the
untreated cell line. The difference between treated and untreated for each cell
line is plotted in figure 1. The results show that ?, ? momorcharin can evoke
large and significant (p < 0.05) increases in cytochrome-c activity in
1321N1, Gos-3, Weri Rb-1 and Corl -23 cell line compared to the respective
untreated cell lines. The results also show that ?, ? momorcharin had little
effect on cytochrome – c activity in L6 skeletal muscle cell line (Figure 1).

Figure 1:
Bar charts showing cytochrome-c activity in (A) six different cancer cell lines
(1321N1, Gos-3, U87-MG, Sk Mel-2, Corl- 23, Weri Rb-1) and healthy L6 muscle
cell line following incubation with 800 µM ?, ? momorcharin for 24 hrs. The
cytochrome-c activity (B) for the untreated (no ?, ? momorcharin) cell lines is
also shown in figure for comparison. Similarly, the background assay kit
control cytochrome-c activity in the absence of any cells is shown in the
figure. Data are mean ± SD, n = 4 different experiments in duplicate. Note that
cytochrome-c activity increased significantly (* p < 0.05) in all the
treated cells compared to untreated cells. The results also show that
cytochrome-c activity was maximal in Gos-3 cell line where as 1321N1, U87- MG,
Sk Mel-2 and Weri Rb-1 contain more or less the same activity. However,
cytochrome- c activity in L6 muscle cell line was the least compared to all the
cancer cell lines.