The fishing yields are
normally dependents of economical (income) fisher motivation, fishing pressure,
fishing technology efficiency and specimen availability. Considering those
parameters, “Catch Per Unit Effort” is controlled either by the effort
intensity and/or SG`s population density (availability). Because SG is highly
market demanded, the intensification of effort induced illegal minimizing
gill-net mesh-size. It was followed by sharp reduction of Bleaks marketing
demands which enhanced fishing effort release from bleaks which cause their
population to enhance. Independently, preferred food biomass by SG, Peridinium
gatunenze, was replaced by Cyanophyta. Alternatively, the SG feeding pressure
on zooplankton was intensified. This diet switch of SG enhanced severity of
food competition with the common zooplanktivorous Bleak fishes. Under common
conditions the Bleak fishery was the major biomass component of the total
whereas the SG and Mugil comprised the major financial value of the annual
yield (Figure 1).
Results in Figure 1 indicates the Followings: 1:
Bleak weight (Biomass) ratio (53%) of the total Kinneret fishery during
1985-2006 were Bleaks whilst later (2007-2016), Bleaks comprised only 22% of
the total landing. The reason for this significant decline was minimizing
market demands (Figure 2). Figure 3 represent the periodical SG crisis when
annual landing was exceptional low (<10 tons/y in 2007, 2008) declined
during 2006-2010. Temporal changes of another Tilapia species, Oreochromis
aureus, (OA) are shown in Figure 4. This fish became common in Lake Kinneret as
a result of stocking prior to the 1990`s and its fishery was therefore
decreased later. Two commercial native and non-stocked Barbel species are not
highly favored by the local consumers and their crops are only “fishing effort”
dependent (Figure 5). The lake population of two exotic species, Silver Carp
(Hypophthalmichtys molitrix and Mugilids, (Mugil cephalus, and Liza ramada) are
absolutely dependents on stocking with respective dock landing (Figures 2-7)
.
Figure 1: Linear regression (95%
CI) between Bleak and total landings during 1985-2016.
Figure 2: LOWESS Smoother plot
of annual fluctuations of Bleak landing (1985-2016).
Figure 3: LOWESS Smoother plot
of annual fluctuations of SG landing (1985-2016).

Figure 4: LOWESS Smoother plot
of annual fluctuations of Oreochromis aureus landing (1985-2016).

Figure 5: LOWESS Smoother plot
of annual fluctuations of Barbels landing (1985-2016).

Figure 6: LOWESS Smoother plot
of annual fluctuations of Silver Carp landing (1985-2016).

Figure 7: LOWESS Smoother plot
of annual fluctuations of Mugil landing (1985-2016).