The overall prevalence
of ectoparasite infestation 18.39% recorded in this study is slightly higher
than that of who reported 16.7% in sheep and goats in Gombe [13]. Prevalence of
10.0% in sheep and goats in Gwagwalada Abuja, Nigeria which is lower than the
report of this study [14]. The report of this study disagrees with very high
prevalence of 45.95%, 55.1%, 68.1% reported in Anambra respectively [15-17]. The
18.63% prevalence reported in goats in this study is lower than 61.70% reported
85.0% reported by Onojafe (2008), 19.0% and 70.7% reported lower prevalence of
3.7% and 14.0% respectively than reported in this study [18]. Goats are
browsers, prefer bushes/shrubs, tree leaves and rough browse plants and need
more space to roam about freely during browsing, thus could be more exposed to
a variety of ectoparasite species.
The 18.12% prevalence reported in sheep in this
study agrees with 18.52% reported 8.7% and reported 13.1% which were lower than
the prevalence in this study. Reported 47.0%, 69.8% and 19.0% respectively in
sheep which were higher than that in this study. The high prevalence of
ectoparasites in sheep could be attributed to less body habits of self-grooming,
licking, scratching, rubbing and grazing behaviour which could contribute to
ectoparasites infestation. Seven ectoparasite species were reported from goats
in this study and which have also been reported including Sarcoptes scabiei, Rhipicephalus sp, Amblyomma sp, Boophilus sp,
Hyalomma sp, Ixodes ricinus and Damalinia ovis. The five ectoparasite
species reported from sheep in this study have been reported by Ctenocephalides felis, Rhipicephalus sp,
Amblyomma sp, Boophilus sp, and Damalinia ovis. The presence and or absence
of ectoparasites reported may be due to seasonal variations in the months of
study, rainfall, temperature, relative humidity and number of animals examined
[19,20]. The predilection sites (back, belly neck, ear, thigh, shoulders,
udder, testes, head and trunk) of these ectoparasites have been reported in
previous studies of who reported ticks on the tail, ears and testis of goats
and Damalinia ovis around the neck and back area of sheep [21]. Genital
distribution of ticks on sheep and goats with more ticks concentration around
the testes. Damalinia ovis on head,
neck and trunk of sheep and head and neck of goats, Rhipicephalus spp. on head, neck, abdomen, trunk, leg, tail and
pelvic of sheep and goats, Boophilus sp.
on abdomen, trunk and pelvic of sheep. Neck and trunk of sheep and head and
neck of goats for Rhipicephalus spp,
Boophilus sp, Damalinia ovis. The predilection sites of these ectoparasites
are likely areas where capillary blood can be reached easily by the ectoparasites
[22].
Table 4: Sex related prevalence
of goats and sheep.
|
Animal type
|
Number of animals infested
|
Male
|
Female
|
Infestation (%)
|
Chi square
|
P value
|
|
Goats
|
30
|
17(56.7%)
|
13(43.3%)
|
18.63
|
0.011
|
0.916
|
|
Sheep
|
27
|
8(29.6%)
|
19(70.4%)
|
18.12
|
|
|
|
Total
|
57
|
25(43.9%)
|
32(56.1%)
|
18.39
|
|
|
This study reports that
middle age (52.35%) and young animals (24.16%) were more susceptible to
ectoparasite infestations than adults (24.16%). This agrees with the reports
but contrary who reported higher prevalence in adult animals than young
animals. Attributed the greater susceptibility of young animals to ectoparasite
infestations to a higher ratio of accessible surface to body volume and poor
grooming behaviour [23-25]. The wool and hair of the young animals is not fully
developed to be able to protect them from ectoparasite infestations.
The report from this study showed that there
were more ectoparasite infestations in female than in male which agrees with
the findings of reported that higher levels of prolactin and progesterone make
females more susceptible to infestation as a result of pregnancy and lactation.
Thus, it could be hypothesized that some hormonal influence is associated with
the higher prevalence of ectoparasitic infestations in females than in males.
This study showed that goats were more susceptible to ectoparasite infestations
than sheep. This is in agreement with the reports of who reported sheep to be
more infested than goats. The susceptibility to ectoparasite infestations being
more in goats than in sheep could be as a result of varying agro-climatic
conditions and ectoparasite species composition in goats and sheep. In
conclusion, goats and sheep are potential carriers or host of ectoparasites in
Katsina which can be of veterinary and medical importance [26,27]. Female and
young animals are the more susceptible to ectoparasite infestations in this
study area. Good sanitation and hygiene should be employed in animal pens and
houses as well as proper and adequate health care of the animals which can
reduce ectoparasite infestation [28-31].