We analyzed the
treatment of 327 newborns with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus was carried out
based on the materials of the Crimean Republican Clinical Hospital for Children
and the Perinatal Center for the period of 2000- 2020. Two groups were
identified. In the Group 1, 184 children underwent treatment according to the
LVV protocol with LP and VP with 20-22G needles at the initial stage, and with
the progression of hydrocephalus, VSGD and VPS (Table 1).
In the Group 2, the treatment complex for 143
children with ventricular occlusion and SAS block at the initial stage included
CTSV [15]. With the progression of hydrocephalus, the treatment complex
involved ventricular drainage in the SAS by the VSS system, which is reflected
in Table 2 [16] (Table 2).
Table 1: Scope of neurosurgical
care in Group 1.
|
Stages of hydrocephalus correction according to the LVV protocol
|
Number of
children
|
%
|
|
LP and VP with 20-22G needles
|
184
|
100
|
|
Ventriculosubgaleal drainage (VSGD)
|
151
|
82.1
|
|
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS)
|
132
|
71.7
|
Table 2: Scope of neurosurgical
care in Group 2.
|
Stages of hydrocephalus correction with inclusion of CTSV and VSS
|
Number of
children
|
%
|
|
CTSV (with 14 G needles) in combination with LP
|
143
|
100
|
|
Ventricular
drainage by VSS system in combination with VSGD
|
94
|
65.7
|
|
Integration of VSS system with the peritoneal shunt segment
|
35
|
24.5
|
CTSV is performed by
puncture with 14G needles at two points through the coronary and lambdoid
sutures of the anterior and occipital horns of the lateral ventricles with
unloading of their blood and cerebrospinal fluid and SAS decompression (Figure
1).

Figure 1: CTSV at the initial
stage of hydrocephalus correction.
Sanitation is performed
by saline solution of the ventricles with arachnoid encephalic lysis when the
needles are shoved into the SAS. Between the ventricles and SAS, drainage
canals with collateral CSF outflow and elimination of occlusion are formed. The
procedure is repeated three times with four-day intervals, alternating with
sanitation of the craniospinal CSF LP pathways, until CSF dynamics
stabilization with clinical restoration of the outflow and absorption of CSF,
based on neuroimaging data. The advantages of the method include the simplicity
of its technical implementation (a child in the incubator), the safety and
effectiveness of the ventricle sanitation from blood clots with minimization of
brain injury during hemotamponade, and a reduction in the sanitation time of
the craniospinal CSF spaces. Draining the ventricles into the SAS by the VSS
system was implemented through ventricular drainage and perforation of the pump
base (Figure 2).

Figure 2: (?) VSS system, (B)
MRI after the surgery.
To do this, after
immersion of the ventricular drainage into the ventricle with control of the
CSF flow, the pump is installed in the milling hole with a diameter of up to 10
mm with the straightening of the fixing cuff in the SAS and fixation by
suturing along the trepanation edges. Additionally, there is a temporary CSF
outflow from the pump through a fragment of the distal drainage into the
subgaleal pocket (SP), which makes it possible to smooth out the drops of
intracranial pressure (ICP) in the postoperative period with unloading and
sanitation of the CSF pathways. The dome of the pump is punctured, and a saline
solution is injected with control of its outflow into the SAS and ventricles.
Reintroduction of saline solution through a pump with active sanitation of the
SAS and ventricles, and passive excretion of CSF through the SP in combination
with LP is conducted at days 3-5, 7, 10 and 14, as well as at the end of the
week 3, 4, 5 and 6 after the surgery. While maintaining the disproportion
between the increasing age-related volume of CSF production and its absorption
after the week 6, the VSS system was integrated with the peritoneal segment of
the shunt at medium pressure through the distal drainage. The data were
processed using the STATISTICA 10.0 software (StatSoft Inc., USA). Fisher’s
exact test was used to compare the percentages in the two groups. Significant
changes in indicators were considered those, for which the probability of the
null hypothesis was: p<0.05.