On average,
the respondents indicated that they are confident that the information they
share is secured has a mean of 2.99. Results also indicated that 33.0% of the
respondents rated very high that they are confident that the information they
share is received by the right person, 44.2% high, 15.2% low, and 7.4% very
low. On average, the respondents indicated that they are confident that the
information they share is received by the right person and has a mean of 3.03.
Results also indicated that 28.7% of the respondents rated very high that the
communication they receive from their bank tells them what they need to know to
avoid falling for cyber-fraudsters, 43.1% high, 21.6% low, and 6.3% very low.
On average, the respondents indicated that the communication they receive from
their bank tells them what they need to know to avoid falling for
cyber-fraudsters has a mean of 2.94. Results also indicated that 46.7% rated
very high service disruptions leading to cashback errors being treated timely,
35.8% high, 11.2% low, and 6.1% very low. On average, the respondents indicated
that service disruptions leading to cashback errors are treated timely has a
mean of 3.23. The weighted mean for operational efficiency is 3.09 which
indicates that on average, respondents agreed with most of the statements on
the high scale as it relates to how operational efficiency is an appropriate
measure of DMBs performance. Moreover, the mean score of 3.09 suggests that
operational efficiency for DMBs is moderately high. In Table 4, E-Banking
Effectiveness was presented as one of the measures of E-banking service quality
of the DMBs in Nigeria using descriptive statistics and computed for each
statement to reveal the frequencies, percentages, and mean on a four-point
Likert-type scale (4 for very high extent (VHE), 3 for high extent (HE), 2 for
low extent (LE), and 1 for very low extent (VLE). According to the results in
Table 4, 48.7% of respondents strongly agree that information on the banking
website is clear and easy to understand, 32.7% agree, 15.2% disagree, and 3.0%
strongly disagree (Table 4). On average, the respondents indicated that
information on the banking website is clear and easy to understand and has a
mean of 3.27. Results also indicated that 41.9% of respondents strongly agree
that they can easily find what they are looking for on the bank portal, 39.3%
agree, 15.5% disagree, and 3.0% strongly disagree. On average, the respondents
indicated that they can easily find what they are looking for on the bank
portal has a mean of 3.20. Results also indicated that 23.4% of the respondents
strongly agree that their banking portal has all information they need to
manage their account, 48.5% agree, 22.8% disagree, and 5.1% strongly disagree.
On average, the respondents indicated that their banking portal has all
information they need to manage their account has a mean of 2.90. Results also
indicated that 37.8% of the respondents strongly agree that the banking portal
works well technically, loads quickly, and displays appropriately, 35.8% agree,
15.7% disagree, and 10.4% strongly disagree. On average, the respondents
indicated that their banking portal works well technically, loads quickly, and
displays appropriately have a mean of 3.01. Results also indicated that 31.7%
of respondents strongly agree that their banking portal meets my needs, 42.1%
agree, 19.8% disagree, and 6.1% strongly disagree. On average, the respondents
indicated that their banking portal meets my needs and has a mean of 3.00.
Results also indicated that 42.9% of respondents strongly agree that they found
that the E-banking service is easy to use, 29.7% agree, 18.0% disagree, and
9.1% strongly disagree. On average, respondents indicated that they found that
the E-banking service is easy to use and has a mean of 3.07. Results also
indicated that 32.9% of respondents strongly agree that services delivered
through E-banking are quick, 41.4% agree, 14.7% disagree, and 11.2% strongly
disagree. On average, the respondents indicated that services delivered through
E-banking are quick has a mean of 2.95. The weighted mean for E-Banking
Effectiveness is 3.06 which indicates that on average, respondents agreed with
most of the statements on the high scale as it relates to how E-Banking
Effectiveness is an appropriate measure of E-Banking service quality. Moreover,
the mean score of 3.09 suggests that E-Banking Effectiveness for DMBs is
moderately high. In Table 5, E-Banking safety was presented as one of the
measures of E-banking service quality of the DMBs in Nigeria using descriptive
statistics and computed for each statement to reveal the frequencies,
percentages, and mean on a four-point Likert-type scale (4 for very high extent
(VHE), 3 for high extent (HE), 2 for low extent (LE), and 1 for very low extent
(VLE). According to results in Table 5, 35.8% of respondents strongly agree
that they have high confidence in the E-banking service in the bank, 41.9%
agree, 18.0% disagree, and 4.0% strongly disagree (Table 5). On average, the
respondents indicated that they have high confidence in the E-banking service
in the bank has a mean of 3.10. Results also indicated that 25.6% of
respondents strongly agree that E-banking is dependable, 56.3% agree, 14.7%
disagree, and 3.0% strongly disagree. On average, the respondents indicated
that E-banking is dependable and has a mean of 3.05. Results also indicated
that 33.8% of the respondents strongly agree that E-banking service provides
high protection for a banking transaction, 40.1% agree, 19.5% disagree, and 6.3%
strongly disagree. On average, the respondents indicated that the E-banking
service provides high protection for my banking transaction and has a mean of
3.02. Results also indicated that 38.8% of the respondents strongly agree that
they feel secure while making transactions through the internet, 37.1% agree,
18.5% disagree, and 5.3% strongly disagree. On average, the respondents
indicated that they feel secure while making transactions through the internet
has a mean of 3.10. Results also indicated that 32.0% of respondents strongly
agree that E-banking services offer secure personal privacy, 42.6% agree, 17.8%
disagree, and 7.4% strongly disagree. On average, the respondents indicated
that E-banking services offer secure personal privacy has a mean of 2.99. The
weighted mean for E-Banking safety is 3.05 which indicates that on average,
respondents agreed with most of the statements on the high scale as it relates
to how E-Banking safety is an appropriate measure of E-Banking service quality.
Moreover, the mean score of 3.09 suggests that E-Banking safety for DMBs is
moderately high. In Table 6, E-Banking transaction support was presented as one
of the measures of E-banking service quality of the DMBs in Nigeria using
descriptive statistics and computed for each statement to reveal the
frequencies, percentages, and mean on a four-point Likert-type scale (4 for
very high extent (VHE), 3 for high extent (HE), 2 for low extent (LE), and 1
for very low extent (VLE). According to the results in Table 6, 51.8% of respondents
strongly agree that they can conveniently process multiple transactions without
issues, 28.7% agree, 18.0% disagree, and 1.3% strongly disagree (Table 6). On
average, the respondents indicated that they can conveniently process multiple
transactions without issues has a mean of 3.31. Results also indicated that
33.5% of respondents strongly agree that their bank's e-banking platforms are
very interactive, 43.4% agree, 20.6% disagree, and 2.3% strongly disagree. On
average, the respondents indicated that their bank's e-banking platforms are
very interactive has a mean of 3.08. Results also indicated that 39.8% of the
respondents strongly agree that their bank provides adequate information that
aid service delivery, 34.8% agree, and 25.1% disagree. On average, the
respondents indicated that their bank provides adequate information that aid
service delivery has a mean of 3.15. Results also indicated that 34.8% of the
respondents strongly agree that their bank provides adequate support to address
customer complaints, 42.1% agree, 20.8% disagree, and 2.0% strongly disagree.
On average, the respondents indicated that their bank provides adequate support
to address customer complaints has a mean of 3.10. Results also indicated that
37.1% of respondents strongly agree that their bank’s customer care unit is
very responsive to customer needs, 38.6% agree, 23.1% disagree, and 1.0%
strongly disagree. On average, the respondents indicated that their bank’s
customer care unit is very responsive to customer needs and has a mean of 3.12.
The weighted mean for E-Banking transaction support is 3.15 which indicates
that on average, respondents agreed with most of the statements on the high
scale as it relates to how E-Banking transaction support is an appropriate measure
of E-Banking service quality. Moreover, the mean score of 3.15 suggests that
E-Banking safety for DMBs is moderately high. In Table 7, Control Activities
was presented as one of the measures of the internal control system of the DMBs
in Nigeria using descriptive statistics and computed for each statement to
reveal the frequencies, percentages, and mean on a four-point Likert-type scale
(4 for very high extent (VHE), 3 for high extent (HE), 2 for low extent (LE),
and 1 for very low extent (VLE). According to results in Table 7, 34.0% of
respondents rated very high that their bank upheld ethical values in all
dealings with customers, 42.1% high, 12.4% low, and 11.2% very low (Table 7).
On average, the respondents indicated that their bank upheld ethical values in
all dealings with customers having a mean of 2.99. Results also indicated that
22.8% of respondents rated very high that their bank has a structure that
spells out the responsibilities of each unit so customers know where to go in
times of need, 52.0% high, 18.8% low, and 6.1% very low. On average, the
respondents indicated that their bank has a structure that spells out the
responsibilities of each unit so customers know where to go in times of need
has a mean of 2.92. Results also indicated that 25.6% of the respondents rated
very high that their bank conduct a periodic survey to ascertain customer
experience of e-banking safety, 53.0% high, 16.0% low, and 5.1% very low. On
average, the respondents indicated that their bank conducts periodic surveys to
ascertain customer experience of e-banking safety has a mean of 2.99. Results
also indicated that 27.9% of the respondents rated very high that their bank
has integrity, has a core value in all dealings with customers, 50.3% high,
16.5% low, and 5.1% very low. On average, the respondents indicated that their
bank has integrity, has a core value in all dealings with customers has a mean
of 3.01. Results also indicated that 38.1% of respondents rated very high that
their bank has measures to ensure risk to client data is minimal to zero, 31.7%
high, 24.9% low, and 5.1% very low. On average, the respondents indicated that
their bank has measures to ensure risk to client data is minimal to zero having
a mean of 3.03. The weighted mean for control activities is 3.00 which
indicates that on average, respondents agreed with most of the statements on
the high scale as it relates to how control activities are an appropriate
measure of the internal control system. Moreover, the mean score of 3.00
suggests that the internal control system for DMBs is moderately high. In Table
8, the control environment was presented as one of the measures of the internal
control system of the DMBs in Nigeria using descriptive statistics and computed
for each statement to reveal the frequencies, percentages, and mean on a
four-point Likert-type scale (4 for very high extent (VHE), 3 for high extent
(HE), 2 for low extent (LE), and 1 for very low extent (VLE) (Table 8). checks
are performed during customer registration, 51.3% high, 19.8% low, and 3.0%
very low. On average, respondents indicated that proper background checks
performed during customer registration have a mean of 3.00. Results also
indicated that 29.4% of respondents rated very high that ethical behaviour is
seen in how staff address customers, 47.0% high, 21.3% low, and 2.0% very low.
On average, the respondents indicated that ethical behaviour is seen in how
staff addresses customers have a mean of 3.04. Results also indicated that
29.7% of the respondents rated very high that there is a specific staff
assigned to a specific responsibility, 49.2% high, 18.8% low, and 2.0% very
low. On average, the respondents indicated that there is a specific staff
assigned to specific responsibility has a mean of 3.07. Results also indicated
that 35.8% of the respondents rated very high that emphasis is on automated
processes, 45.9% high, 13.7% low, and 4.3% very low. On average, the
respondents indicated that emphasis on automated processes has a mean of 3.13.
Results also indicated that 31.7% of the respondents rated very high that there
is evidence of a clear chain of command in my bank, 42.6% high, 18.8% low, and
6.6% very low. On average, the respondents indicated that there is evidence of
a clear chain of command in my bank has a mean of 3.00. The weighted mean for
the control environment is 3.05 which indicates that on average, respondents
agreed with most of the statements on the high scale as it relates to how
control activities are an appropriate measure of the internal control system.
Moreover, the mean score suggests that the internal control system for DMBs is
moderately high. In Table 9, Risk Assessment was presented as one of the
measures of the internal control system of the DMBs in Nigeria using
descriptive statistics and computed for each statement to reveal the
frequencies, percentages, and mean on a four-point Likert-type scale (4 for
very high extent (VHE), 3 for high extent (HE), 2 for low extent (LE), and 1
for very low extent (VLE) (Table 9). According to results in Table 10, 37.8% of
respondents rated very high that their bank warns against sharing sensitive
account details with strangers, 31.7% high, 23.6% low, and 6.6% very low. On
average, respondents indicated that their bank warns against sharing sensitive
account details with strangers has a mean of 3.01. Results also indicated that
27.9% of the respondents rated very high that there is a unit in my bank
dedicated to dealing with fraud on customer accounts, 44.7% high, 22.1% low,
and 5.1% very low. On average, the respondents indicated that there is a unit
in my bank dedicated to dealing with fraud on customer accounts has a mean of
2.96. Results also indicated that 25.6% of respondents rated very high that
there are mechanisms in place to mitigate customer risks, 40.9% high, 25.1%
low, and 8.1% very low. On average, the respondents indicated that there are
mechanisms in place to mitigate customer risks has a mean of 2.84. Results also
indicated that 25.9% of the respondents rated very high that staff attending to
customer bear names in the event of a referral, 43.9% high, 20.6% low, and 9.4%
very low. On average, the respondents indicated that staff attending to
customer bear names in the event of referral has a mean of 2.87. Results also
indicated that 19.5% of the respondents rated very high that their bank has in
place mechanisms for mitigating critical risks that may result in customers
being defrauded, 50.0% high, 21.8% low, and 8.4% very low. On average, the
respondents indicated that their bank has in place mechanisms for mitigating
critical risks that may result in customers being defrauded has a mean of 2.81.
Results also indicated that 29.6% of the respondents rated very high that their
bank ensures proper accountability regarding fraud-related customer complaints
about its employee, 42.9% high, 19.8% low, and 10.2% very low. On average, the
respondents indicated that their bank ensures proper accountability regarding
fraud-related customer complaints about its employee has a mean of 2.87. The
weighted mean for Risk Assessment is 2.89 which indicates that on average,
respondents agreed with most of the statements on the averagely-high scale as
it relates to how Risk Assessment is an appropriate measure of the internal
control system. Moreover, the mean score of 2.89 suggests that the internal
control system for DMBs is moderately high.