Based upon the research undertaken by Alattas and
Tayachi, other Middle Eastern countries that had adopted Microfinancing as of
2016 included Jordan with seven microfinancing institutions and Yemen with 6
microfinancing institutions. The authors did not present statistics at this
date for other larger Middle Eastern countries such as Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, United
Arab Emirates, or Turkey. The statistics have not varied much since 2016.
According to the Impact Finance Barometer 2021 report, the number of borrowers
in the MENA was at 3% across the MENA region (Convergences, 2021). The report
highlighted that the percentage of women borrowers was 59% compared to the
global average of 81%. The portfolio yield was compared to other regions. The
portfolio yield for MENA (18.7%) was lower than 22.3%, recorded for different
areas.
Present situation
The microfinance industry has become well established
in the Middle East and is expected to continue to grow in the future. The
regulatory environment in most Middle Eastern countries has taken shape, which
has been a critical factor in the industry's growth. The regulatory environment
has set down the framework of rules, policies, and procedures that have been
needed to remove the unscrupulous players. The regulatory environment has
provided additional transparency and accountability amongst the micro-financial
institutions. Many microfinancing businesses have changed from a not-for-profit
status to for-profit companies due to the transformation across the industry
and in each country in the Middle East (International Finance Corporation,
2018). Consequently, the increase in the number of for-profit companies has
brought operational efficiencies across each country, plus improvements in the
economies of scale. The improvement in the regulatory environment plus the
growth in the number of institutions has enabled more financial products to be
made available, plus rates that are more competitive and fees. The increase in
the number of microfinance institutions has provided the opportunity to serve a
more significant number of low-income people. For-profit microfinance
institutions need to survive and survive sustainably for the long term. To
serve low-income people, they are constantly in need of fresh capital. Before
transforming to for-profit companies, the traditional form of funding for
not-for-profit institutions was donor funding, but this is not a reliable
funding source as this type of funding has become limited in recent years.
Donor funding is not a sustainable form of funding. Similarly, not-for-profit
institutions sought funding from other development finance institutions and
commercial banks. These two types of financing approaches have limited the
not-for-profit corporations' leverage capabilities as (i) the institutions had
to rely upon donor funding to increase their equity and (ii) the limitations on
the financial leverage ratios that were placed upon these corporations because
of their legal status (International Finance Corporation, 2018). Development
finance institutions and commercial banks often say that these not-for-profit
organisations are too risky to lend or invest in due to the regulatory leverage
limitations. Therefore, for these microfinance institutions to survive long
term, they had to change their legal structure from not-for-profit to
for-profit. The for-profit microfinance institutions received a better
reputation than not-for-profit institutions. The for-profit microfinance
institutions were able to survive longer as they could increase their financial
leverage as they could raise new equity or other funding sources. The
regulations in some countries across the Middle East prevent microfinance
institutions from offering savings products (International Finance Corporation,
2018). Yemen and Syria are the only countries in the Middle East that allow
microfinance banks and non-bank financial institutions to offer savings to
low-income people. Consequently, transformation in the industry took place. In
Yemen, the Al Kuraimi Islamic Microfinance Bank, previously a money exchange
company, is now a microfinance bank. A similar transformation occurred in
Syria, with the FMFI transforming from an NGO into a non-bank financial
institution. (International Finance Corporation, 2018). The gender demographic
across the Middle East is about two-thirds female who seeks assistance from
microfinance institutions (Triodos Investment Management, 2018). The female
gender manages a range of small size businesses. Their participation in
small-scale enterprises provides a greater level of independence and improved
status amongst the population, and they are favourably looked upon as economic
contributors. Gender inequality still exists, with women more likely to be
unemployed than men, so more women are applying for microfinance assistance.
The MENA region has seen a broader impact on the political and socio-economic
status with an influx of refugees due to the various civil unrests. It is
reported that there are an estimated 1.5 million refugees situated in Lebanon.
Lebanon's total population is 5.9 million. One in four people in Lebanon is a
refugee, most of whom have arrived from Syria. A similar status of refugees can
be found in Jordan. With a population of 9.9 million, Jordan is host to 1.4
million refugees, mainly from Syria. There is significant political pressure in
these two countries to provide microfinance to the refugees. This political
pressure arises because these refugees may not return to their home countries
and decide to stay in these countries. On the other side, microfinance
institutions do not wish to provide loans if they become exposed to the risk
that these refugees return to their country and do not repay the loans.
Research indicates that microfinancing in Palestine was needed to provide
economic development and stability [5]. The authors' study examined the conceptual
framework of how microfinancing institutions helped improve the direct and
indirect economic development of Palestine.
Regulatory environment
Microfinancing has become an essential component of
expanding access to financial products which traditionally would not be offered
to the unemployed or low-income people. Microfinancing has not reached its full
potential due to the regulatory environment in many Middle Eastern countries.
The regulatory climate or non-existence of such an environment can be a
significant barrier for microfinance institutions. Triodos states that
countries with little or no regulatory environment need to develop a solid legal
and regulatory framework (Triodos Investment Management, 2018). In addition to
the substantial legal and regulatory framework, there is a need to provide
specialised support services. A robust regulatory framework coupled with
technical support services will assist in making the microfinancing industry
stronger in countries with little or no regulatory environment. Middle Eastern
countries of Jordan and Yemen are prime examples of the regulatory environment
limiting the type of financial products that microfinance institutions can
offer and restrictions on their credit offering to the public. These
limitations vary between the countries. In the case of Jordan, the loan cap is
linked to the microfinance institution's outstanding portfolio of equity. The loan
cap is based on 0.2% of the total portfolio or equity (Triodos Investment
Management, 2018). The loan cap is 0.1% of the institution's equity or
outstanding portfolio in Yemen. These loan cap levels can be increased by
increasing its portfolio of equity. This is not always the case in other
countries. Tunisia, for example, has a loan cap of 20,000 Tunisian dinars. In
Egypt, the loan cap is 100,000 Egyptian pounds.
The good intention of having a regulatory environment
is supposed to provide extra security to microfinance institutions. Still, the
limitations that are placed can hinder the promotion of these institutions and
can be deemed to be undesirable intentions. Apart from the limits mentioned,
some regulations limit the amount of lending that can be done as part of their
normal business activities. This limitation is a barrier that prevents
microfinance institutions from upscaling their business operations. The
microfinance institutions could be serving a more significant market segment
where the needs are far higher than the capped loan that the banks do not
serve. The limitation on lending prevents low-income people from accessing
finance for education, home improvements, or even purchasing their own homes
(International Finance Corporation, 2018). Microfinance institutions can
bolster their presence in the marketplace where regulations exist that allow
these institutions to raise equity capital and add new financial services and
products. These institutions have a more significant segment of the low-income
population to be able to tap into. Deposit mobilisation and other financial
services can be found in the regulatory environment of countries such as Yemen
and Syria. Microfinance institutions in Jordan, Palestine, and Tunisia are
restricted from allowing these institutions to provide credit. This limitation
in Tunisia saw the rise of microfinance institutions that changed their
business structure from a not-for-profit organisation to for-profit ones. The
benefit arising from this transformation to a for-profit organisation allowed
these institutions to increase the size of their loan cap. The loan cap on a
for-profit institution was increased to 20,000 Tunisian dinars. The loan cap
was substantially less for not-for-profit organizations at 5,000 Tunisian
dinars. The regulatory environment did not provide any unique benefits in Egypt
if microfinance institutions changed their business structure to for-profit
organisations. The regulatory environment in Egypt provided many disincentives,
such as increases in fees that made operational expenses more expensive. The
increase in fees made some financial products not viable to offer to the
public. The Egyptian regulatory environment provided higher income tax rates,
thus creating a disincentive for microfinance institutions to transform into
for-profit organisations. The legislation also prevented those not-for-profit
organisations could not become shareholders in other companies. This
legislation prevented not-for-profit organisations from expanding their business
activities (International Finance Corporation, 2018). In Palestine, as of 2019,
8 microfinance institutions were operating under different business structures,
such as non-profit organisations, donor programs, non-government businesses,
and cooperatives. Similar to previous studies, women's empowerment was one of
the main reasons for the growth in microfinancing. The authors stated that this
new trend differed from many decades ago when women were not recognised for
economic development. Consequently, microfinance institutions have made some
significance in providing people with basic needs and improved employment
opportunities [6-13].
Barriers to Microfinance Development across the Middle
East
Barriers to the development of microfinance can be
classified into two labels – (i) generic barriers and (ii) country-specific
barriers.
The generic barriers listed below apply across the
global industry for microfinance.
- As
many developing countries are slowly accepting microfinance as a popular
alternative solution for reaching the people in need, the most significant
barrier is the absence of administrative and institutional support.
- This
level of support not being available further leads to another barrier
associated with the lack of savings and fiscal exchange, as the previous focus
had been upon the supply of loans only.
- Restrictive
regulations imposed by global finance sectors.
- Some
providers are not registered under the required regulations; hence, these
providers will lack the experience, industry knowledge, and skills.
- Interest
rates are not necessarily regulated in some countries. Access to finance by
microfinance providers can be costly, with interest rates imposed upon them by
banking institutions. Microfinance providers have limited purchasing power.
- Microfinance
institutes in most countries across the region need to use private equity to
raise capital because they cannot collect savings, like traditional
microfinance banks, to fund loans.
- These
barriers can be lifted or reduced to a low level to ensure a more level,
unrestricted playing field. An even playing field with low barriers to entry
will encourage more players to enter the marketplace and be able to provide
microfinancing services.