Figure 1 shows the AOIs
or predefined areas of interest for data analysis. There are five areas of
interest determined a priori: those located in the center of the screen that go
from attribute one to attribute three, in the area of ??attribute number one
appeared the brand of the product and the following sentence:
"Bioengineering applied to the healing of wounds”. For attribute number
two, images of cells, chains of cells, and the like were constantly appearing.
For attribute number three it appeared: "Greater granulation tissue,
appearance, color and elasticity similar to normal" and "Wounds,
Burns, Skin Ulcers". The fourth area of ??interest was located in the
upper left corner of the screen, where the product brand would continually
appear, and the area of ??interest located in the lower right corner of the
screen, where the laboratory logo always appeared. Pharmaceutical manufacturer
of the product to be evaluated. The product evaluated was a topical cream for
the healing of skin wounds due to burns. In this article, neither the brand nor
the name of the laboratory is presented, for reasons of privacy of this data
(Figure 1).

Figure 1: Areas of Interest.
Figure 2 shows the four
heat maps or heat maps as a result of the eye tracking tests applied to the men
participating in the study. These heat maps reflect the specific moments where
the greatest focus of attention was generated in the video. In maps number one
and two it is observed that the highest count of gaze fixations occurred for
attribute number one and to a lesser extent for attribute number three. At
these specific moments in the video there were no reinforcement phrases towards
the product. In map number three, the fixation trend towards attributing one
continues, and for attribute three, attention is already focused on the
explanatory text or argumentation about the healing benefits of the product. In
map number four, attention is strongly focused on the healing effect of the
cream, that is, an attribute number one (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Heat maps for men.
Figure 3 shows the four
heat maps or heat maps made to the women participating in the study. These maps
reflect the specific moments where the greatest focus of attention was
generated in the video. The resulting heat maps are similar to the behaviour of
the gazing for the group of men, with a similar tendency towards great
attention to the demonstration of the effectiveness of healing cream, chosen in
attribute number one of map number four (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Heat mas for female.
Now, observing in
figure 4 the distribution of absolute frequencies by gender, of each one of the
AOIs from the heat maps or heat maps of figures one and two, attribute number
one obtained the highest number of aggregated fixations, followed by attribute
three and two. The brand and logo areas present low counts of added fixations,
and of the latter two, the pharmaceutical company logo did not attract the
attention of the study participants (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Frecuencies by gender.
Descriptively, some
incidence of the gender variable can be seen in each of the areas of interest
under study. In this sense, we proceeded with the ANOVA analysis to clarify
whether both the gender variable and the area of interest variable, influenced
the behaviour of the pupil diameter of the participants. In order to complement
this analysis, Figure 5 provides the aggregate distribution of fixations in
relation to the diameter of the pupil observed in men and women. The diameter
of the pupil for men and women ranges from approximately three to seven
millimetres. The data distribution for both men and women does not fit the
normal curve. With an average diameter of the pupil smaller in men than in
women. This suggests that the process of fixation and attention was greater in
women than in men, because the diameter of the pupil in women is greater than
in men (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Normal test.
Continuing the analysis
of the incidence of the gender variable and particularly the category of women,
it is pertinent prior to any confirmatory analysis, to apply the normality test
for the pupil diameter through the Shapiro Wilks contrast, this contrast
yielded a significance of 0. 000 with 1032 degrees of freedom and its statistic
of 0.982. Checking what was stated in the previous paragraph of the absence of
normality in the data of the variable pupil diameter.
Having determined the
absence of normality, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied, in order to
determine if there were significant differences in two groups of independent
variables. These groups were the gender variable and the areas of interest
AOIs. Duration time (Fixation) and pupil diameter were chosen for the variables
to be contrasted. Before proceeding with the analysis of variance, the Levine
test of equality of variances was requested for the two variables to be
contrasted. In relation to the independent variable Gender and the variable
time of duration, the statistic was 14,565 with significance 0.000. In turn,
for the variable pupil dilation, the Levine
statistic was 23.046 and significance 0.0000. Allowing to establish for both
cases the non-equality of the variances for each of the effect variables. Now,
for the independent variable areas of interest, the same contrast was repeated,
yielding 4.716 as Levine’s statistic and significance as 0.001. Since the
diameter of the pupil the statistic has been 2.571 and significance was 0.037.
Likewise, it can be asserted that the data from the contrasted variables do not
present equal variances. Knowing the results of the tests for the assumption of
the equality of the variances, the Games-Howell test is chosen as the contrast
statistic, which allows the results of the statistics to be contrasted under
the assumption of difference in the variances (Table 1).
Table 1: ANOVA.
|
Tests of
Normality
|
|
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
|
Shapiro-wilk
|
|
Statistic
|
df
|
sig.
|
Statistic
|
df
|
sig.
|
|
Duration time
|
0.162
|
1032
|
0
|
0.784
|
1032
|
0
|
|
Pupil Diameter
|
0.048
|
1032
|
0
|
0.982
|
1032
|
0
|
Table 1 shows the
results of the ANOVA tests for the independent variables gender and AOIs. The
gender variable affects the two contrasted variables (Time of duration of
fixation and pupil diameter), with level p <0.05, however, for the
independent variable AOIs, it only affects the differences in the variances of
the variable “Pupil diameter”. Additionally, the Games-Howell test (Partial eta
squared column of table number one), of non-equality of variances being very
low in the score, only allows us to clarify that the independent variable
gender affects the two independent variables more strongly than the variable
AOIs. Having determined that the gender variable affects the behaviour of the
pupil diameter and the areas of interest (AOIs), and as a descriptive
complement to the ANOVA analysis, the correspondence analysis is presented in
order to identify the closest associations between the categories. Of the AOI
variable and the categories of the variable "Pupil diameter". Given
that the variable "Pupil diameter" has the characteristics of a
continuous variable, it was transformed into an ordinal variable, converting
these values to "z" values with mean 0 and deviation 1. Values
greater than one deviation were named as "Dilated Pupil", values
between 0 and 1, were assigned the category "Normal pupil" and values
lower than 0, it was called with the category "Pupil in contraction".
Through this method a new ordinal variable with three categories was created.
For the correspondence analysis procedure, SPSS 22 was used. Assigning the
independent variable "AOIs" in the column categories and the new
variable "Pupil Dilation" in the row categories. Table 2 shows the
results of the correspondence analysis, observing that the dimension number one
represents 95.5% of the total variation and the dimension number two represents
only 4.5% (Table 2).
Table 2: Dimensions of the
correspondence analysis.
|
Summary
|
|
Dimension
|
Singular value
|
Inertia
|
Chi square
|
Sig.
|
proportion of Inertia
|
Confidence singular value
|
|
Accounted for
|
Cummulative
|
Standard deviation
|
Correlation 2
|
|
1
|
0.158
|
0.025
|
|
|
0.995
|
0.995
|
0.03
|
-0.028
|
|
2
|
0.34
|
0.001
|
|
|
0.045
|
1
|
0.03
|
|
|
Total
|
|
0.026
|
27.052
|
0.001a
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
a. 8 degrees
of freedom
|
In table number three,
we can see the relative contributions of each of the categories of the column
and row variables to the two dimensions that represent the associations or
correspondences between them. Dimension one that collects or represents 95.5% of
the total variation, is loaded first by the category “Dilated Pupil” followed
by the category “Contracted Pupil”. In the categories of the variable AOIs,
attributes three and two, respectively, contribute the most to this dimension,
followed by attribute one and the product brand. For dimension number two,
which represents 4.5% of the total variance, it corresponds to the category
"Normal pupil" and the logo of the pharmaceutical laboratory (Table
3).
Table 3: Relative Contributions.
|
Variable
|
Code
|
D1
|
D2
|
|
Pupil
|
Contraction
|
93.62611
|
6.37359
|
|
Diameter
|
Normal
|
11.5468
|
88.45359
|
|
Dilated
|
99.7319
|
0.26587
|
|
Areas of Interest AOIs
|
Attribute 1
|
89.5288
|
10.4489
|
|
Attribute 2
|
96.88145
|
3.11754
|
|
Attribute 3
|
99.3691
|
0.63136
|
|
Brand
|
91.38765
|
8.61399
|
|
Logo
|
63.34464
|
36.65255
|
Observing the
correspondence map of figure number six and taking into account the relative
correspondence of dimension one (D1), we see the closeness of attribute three
and the brand of the product, with the "Dilated Pupil" and attribute
two moves away of attribute three and without correspondence with the size of
the pupil. This could mean that the brand and attributes featured in focus area
number three generated more attention than attributes one and two, along with
the pharmaceutical company logo (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Correspondences map.
Next, the analysis of
the verbal responses to the questions asked after watching the video is
described, it is convenient to remember that asking a person to answer some
questions together with the evaluation of each of the response items, is a
process that activates system two or the rational brain proposed by Kahneman
and Tversky. Here, the importance of comparing or descriptively comparing the
responses obtained in the eye-tracking tests is highlighted against the verbal
responses that are presented below. Table number four collects the answers to
the question about the general opinion about the video, the data represented
includes the mean and the coefficient of variation, obtaining the highest value
for the category "Credible" and the one with the lowest coefficient
of variation (Table 4).
Table 4: Descriptive video analysis.
|
|
Mean
|
Coefficient of
Variation
|
|
Shocking
|
5.267
|
24.3
|
|
Differentiated
|
5.333
|
25.2
|
|
New
|
5.6
|
28.5
|
|
Credible
|
6.2
|
13.9
|
In table number five,
the averages and coefficients of variation of the responses obtained two
sentences that collected the attributes represented within the areas of
interest are presented. Being able to establish the interesting coincidence
between the verbal responses and the fixations with their respective diameters
of the pupil. The highest average is collected by one of the attributes located
in area of interest number one, followed by attribute number one
"Accelerates the healing process” (Table 5).
Table 5: Attribute statistics.
|
Frase
|
Mean
|
Coefficient of Variation
|
|
It is
effective in managing wounds and skin ulcers.
|
5.993
|
23.4
|
|
It has
bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity, protecting the affected area from
possible infection.
|
6.8
|
6.1
|
|
Reduces wound evolution time.
|
5.867
|
30.8
|
|
Accelerates the healing process.
|
6.257
|
19.5
|
|
Provides a
greater granulation fabric leaving skin with similar appearance, color and
elasticity.
|
6.267
|
22.1
|
Finally, in table number
six the doctors decided whether they would prescribe the product or not. 60%
say they know the product, but had not prescribed it and would start to
prescribe it.