Design,
locus, sampling and respondents
This study utilized a descriptive-survey design. The
researchers intend to gather data regarding the extent of current burnout and
stress management conditions of the teacher [27], to analyse and measure the
association of specific variables in order to predict or explain certain
phenomenon [28]. This research utilizing a quantitative design employed
mathematical models or statistical methods in order to determine their
relationships [29]. To attempt to determine the extent of the relationship
between the burnout level and the stress management competency level of the
secondary teachers in Mandaue City Division, Cebu, Philippines for the School
Year 2016- 1017. The City of Mandaue has twenty seven barangays with twenty
three high school departments but randomly selected to have successfully
involved 47 out of 64 respondents from Don Gerardo Llamera Memorial National
High school, 19 out of 40 from Jagobiao National High school, 13 out of 16 from
Tingub National High school with nineteen (19) high school teachers and 13 out
of 16 from Pagsabungan National High school. The inclusion of the four schools
has no inclusion-exclusion criteria except for being regular- permanent status
of the teacher- respondents in Mandaue City Division and proportionate random
sampling design to have one hundred three (103) high school teachers of the one
hundred thirty nine (139) total high school teachers. The qualified
respondents: a) must be actively teaching, b) a bona fide teacher of the
identified schools c) with provision of an implied consent.
This research recognizes trends and patterns in data.
The variables are not manipulated; rather, they are only identified and are
studied as they occur in a natural setting. A description of the current status
of the teacher’s burnout and stress management competency were made, correlated
burnout level and stress, and management competency of the secondary teachers.
Instruments
The study determined the responses to the research
questions through the utilization of two tools, namely: Maslach’s Burnout
Inventory and the Stress Management Competency Tool. On the first part of the
tool, profiling questions were required which are characteristic of a person’s
professional status: years of teaching experience, number of hours on
stress-related seminars attended and their number of preparations.
Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) was validated by the
extensive research that has been conducted in the more than twenty-five years
since its initial publication. Several studies have performed validity tests on
these tools such as the study made in their study entitled Maslach Burnout
Inventory: Factorial validity and Invariance among Romanian Healthcare
Professionals. Also, the US National Library of Medicine conducted a validity
test on the Maslach tool in their study, “Evaluating the Psychometric
Properties of Maslach Tool”.
The Maslach’s Burnout Inventory tool addresses three
general scales: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal
accomplishments. It is composed of three sections with 22 items all in all,
answerable by checking an option coded namely: never (0), a few times per year
(1), once a month(2), a few time per month(2), once a week(4), a few times per
week (5) and every day(6) proceeded with certain guidelines on section A and B
of the tool. A score of 17 or less and 5 or less respectively is considered as
a low level burnout. A score of 18-29 on section A is moderate burnout; beyond
30 is considered high level burnout. For section B, a score of 6-11is moderate
burnout while a score of more than 12 is high burnout. Inversely, on section C,
the score of 33 or less is high level burn-out, 34-39 is moderate burnout,
while obtaining a score of more than 40 is low level burnout.
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in United Kingdom
devised the manager’s competency for preventing and reducing stress can be
geared towards identifying the management competencies in preventing and
dealing with work related stress. Moreover, it allows managers to assess
whether they currently possess the behaviours identified as effective for
preventing and reducing stress at work and helps managers reflect on their
behaviour and management styles (Health services Executive, 1996). The Stress
Management Competency Indicator tool comprised four areas, namely: managing
emotions and having integrity, managing and communicating existing and future
work, managing the individual within the team and managing difficult
situations. Each area is composed of twelve to twenty three items depicting a
certain behaviour or competency. To answer the tool, the respondents were
expected to tick a scale of one to five namely strongly disagree (1), disagree
(2), slightly agree(3), agree(4) and strongly agree(5). To interpret the mean
scores, 75% or below is “development need”, 76% to 89% is a reasonable level
and 90% is effective.